* keep the option to avoid the script from producing an error - it NOPs.
* removed a dead branch of code since it is now impossible for the
`luajit` and `luajit_path` options to be both enabled at once.
* update `--help` output to remove mentions of PUC-Rio Lua
Yet another fix for this test case. The util/fix-tests script seems to
be working fine and preserving the `--- out_like` section, so I honestly
have no idea why it keeps being overridden.
This memory leak was found by running the Valgrind testing mode against
lua-resty-core's `ssl-session-fetch.t` test suite:
TEST 5: yield during doing handshake with client which uses low version OpenSSL
==16956== 64 (32 direct, 32 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 5 of 15
==16956== at 0x4C2B002: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:298)
==16956== by 0x5FFC868: CRYPTO_malloc (mem.c:222)
==16956== by 0x5FFC96F: CRYPTO_zalloc (mem.c:230)
==16956== by 0x603C54A: OPENSSL_sk_new_reserve (stack.c:209)
==16956== by 0x603C597: OPENSSL_sk_new_null (stack.c:118)
==16956== by 0x5C94A86: sk_SSL_CIPHER_new_null (ssl.h:960)
==16956== by 0x5C94A86: bytes_to_cipher_list (ssl_lib.c:5361)
==16956== by 0x5CB52E9: tls_early_post_process_client_hello (statem_srvr.c:1713)
==16956== by 0x5CB52E9: tls_post_process_client_hello (statem_srvr.c:2231)
==16956== by 0x5CB6F39: ossl_statem_server_post_process_message (statem_srvr.c:1218)
==16956== by 0x5CA4C11: read_state_machine (statem.c:664)
==16956== by 0x5CA4C11: state_machine (statem.c:434)
==16956== by 0x5CA538A: ossl_statem_accept (statem.c:255)
==16956== by 0x5C91759: SSL_do_handshake (ssl_lib.c:3609)
==16956== by 0x45456B: ngx_ssl_handshake (ngx_event_openssl.c:1606)
==16956== by 0x4698D3: ngx_http_ssl_handshake (ngx_http_request.c:751)
==16956== by 0x44ECA8: ngx_epoll_process_events (ngx_epoll_module.c:901)
==16956== by 0x443E94: ngx_process_events_and_timers (ngx_event.c:257)
==16956== by 0x44DC25: ngx_single_process_cycle (ngx_process_cycle.c:333)
==16956== by 0x4236AB: main (nginx.c:382)
==16956==
{
<insert_a_suppression_name_here>
Memcheck:Leak
match-leak-kinds: definite
fun:malloc
fun:CRYPTO_malloc
fun:CRYPTO_zalloc
fun:OPENSSL_sk_new_reserve
fun:OPENSSL_sk_new_null
fun:sk_SSL_CIPHER_new_null
fun:bytes_to_cipher_list
fun:tls_early_post_process_client_hello
fun:tls_post_process_client_hello
fun:ossl_statem_server_post_process_message
fun:read_state_machine
fun:state_machine
fun:ossl_statem_accept
fun:SSL_do_handshake
fun:ngx_ssl_handshake
fun:ngx_http_ssl_handshake
fun:ngx_epoll_process_events
fun:ngx_process_events_and_timers
fun:ngx_single_process_cycle
fun:main
}
==16956== 368 (32 direct, 336 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 8 of 15
==16956== at 0x4C2B002: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:298)
==16956== by 0x5FFC868: CRYPTO_malloc (mem.c:222)
==16956== by 0x5FFC96F: CRYPTO_zalloc (mem.c:230)
==16956== by 0x603C54A: OPENSSL_sk_new_reserve (stack.c:209)
==16956== by 0x603C597: OPENSSL_sk_new_null (stack.c:118)
==16956== by 0x5C94A79: sk_SSL_CIPHER_new_null (ssl.h:960)
==16956== by 0x5C94A79: bytes_to_cipher_list (ssl_lib.c:5360)
==16956== by 0x5CB52E9: tls_early_post_process_client_hello (statem_srvr.c:1713)
==16956== by 0x5CB52E9: tls_post_process_client_hello (statem_srvr.c:2231)
==16956== by 0x5CB6F39: ossl_statem_server_post_process_message (statem_srvr.c:1218)
==16956== by 0x5CA4C11: read_state_machine (statem.c:664)
==16956== by 0x5CA4C11: state_machine (statem.c:434)
==16956== by 0x5CA538A: ossl_statem_accept (statem.c:255)
==16956== by 0x5C91759: SSL_do_handshake (ssl_lib.c:3609)
==16956== by 0x45456B: ngx_ssl_handshake (ngx_event_openssl.c:1606)
==16956== by 0x4698D3: ngx_http_ssl_handshake (ngx_http_request.c:751)
==16956== by 0x44ECA8: ngx_epoll_process_events (ngx_epoll_module.c:901)
==16956== by 0x443E94: ngx_process_events_and_timers (ngx_event.c:257)
==16956== by 0x44DC25: ngx_single_process_cycle (ngx_process_cycle.c:333)
==16956== by 0x4236AB: main (nginx.c:382)
==16956==
{
<insert_a_suppression_name_here>
Memcheck:Leak
match-leak-kinds: definite
fun:malloc
fun:CRYPTO_malloc
fun:CRYPTO_zalloc
fun:OPENSSL_sk_new_reserve
fun:OPENSSL_sk_new_null
fun:sk_SSL_CIPHER_new_null
fun:bytes_to_cipher_list
fun:tls_early_post_process_client_hello
fun:tls_post_process_client_hello
fun:ossl_statem_server_post_process_message
fun:read_state_machine
fun:state_machine
fun:ossl_statem_accept
fun:SSL_do_handshake
fun:ngx_ssl_handshake
fun:ngx_http_ssl_handshake
fun:ngx_epoll_process_events
fun:ngx_process_events_and_timers
fun:ngx_single_process_cycle
fun:main
}
The script started failing with:
mv: cannot stat 'simplresty-ngx_devel_kit-*': No such file or directory
Since the GitHub organization owning the ngx_devel_kit repository was
updated to be 'vision5' instead of 'simplresty'.
Yichun Zhang (agentzh)
lijunlong
罗泽轩
Meathill
root
lijunlong
Thibault Charbonnier
Namrata Bhave